brunos_blog_400With all due respect to Frank Vogel’s relentless optimism, the latest news on Danny Granger cannot be viewed as anything other than a major setback for both the individual and the team.

This is happening at the worst possible time for a Pacers team that desperately needs to be fine-tuning for the playoffs, not putting the rotation up on the rack waiting for a part to arrive.

After playing regular minutes in three games, and then only in the first half of two, Granger’s left knee did not respond well. He reported what Vogel referred to as “above-average” soreness, underwent an MRI on Monday and missed practice Tuesday.

Wednesday, the Pacers sent out an advisory that said in part “no new damage” was found but that Granger would go back on the shelf and be re-evaluated in a week.

The two operative phrases there were “new damage,” which suggests the old damage is causing this issue, and “re-evaluated,” which doesn’t mean he’ll be playing again next week. It means they’ll see if he can play in a week. Given he was down more than four months before coming back, you have to wonder how much improvement can be expected in a week.

“We’re not looking at it like (it is a setback),” Vogel said. “We’re looking at it as being precautionary, understanding it’s still a long season, there’s still a lot of time left. We want him to get back to 100 percent and this is the best way to do it. We’re looking at it like it’s hopefully going to be a short-term thing.”

It is a long season, but there isn’t that much time left. The Pacers have 21 games remaining. By the time Granger is re-evaluated, the number will be down to 18. At that point, there will be just one month left in the regular season – a critical month for a team in a tightly packed Eastern Conference playoff race.

A couple of bad weeks could cost them the Central Division, homecourt advantage and any real chance of a deep playoff run. Nine of the next 14 are on the road, so the potential for a couple of bad weeks is real.

The thing is, what options do the Pacers have?

They could shut down The Granger Experiment, and that may be a stronger possibility in a week if he is unable to play. For now, however, the potential of what he could mean to the team in the postseason is too great to abandon before it is absolutely, positively necessary.

No, for the time being they must make the best of it, see if Sam Young, Orlando Johnson or even Gerald Green can bring something, anything off the bench. Even without Granger, the starting lineup is just fine. It’s the second unit that would benefit most from his return.

In the last six games, the bench has been outscored by 84 points, an average of 14 per game. The reserves combined to shoot 34.2 percent overall, 20 percent from the 3-point line. And Granger played in five of those games. The deficit in the 83-81 loss to Boston Wednesday was 29-16, keeping in mind the Celtics have been so decimated by injuries they signed three guys out of the Chinese league just to fill out their roster.

“Obviously, we all wanted him to come back and within a week be playing 38 minutes and being pain-free,” Vogel said. “That was the best-case scenario. This isn’t anywhere near the worst-case scenario. It’s just part of the process, not as smoothly as we would have hoped but we still feel very confident he’s going to give us a big lift down the stretch.”

Because that is still a possibility, it is not yet time to pull the plug on Granger. But the Pacers can ill afford to let uncertainty linger much longer.



2 Responses to Is it time to pull the plug on Granger’s comeback?

  1. I think Danny should have taken Derek Rose’s route and still not be back. Even though it was great to see him come back at this time, now with this happening, let’s not wait on him. Let’s get back to our original cast of First Place Central Division players and continue to the playoffs without him. I think we are the only team that can beat Miami in the East and if our guys have a distraction like if and when he can play over them, it could hurt. WE have a very very good group of players without him, let them continue to show what they have been showing us to a TITLE! Go Pacers!

  2. It’s rough news. At this point in the season, even if he does make it back in say, April, Granger’s history suggests his inefficient starts could hurt more than help. I think he’s effectively done for the season.

    Frankly, I think the Pacers need to prioritize keeping this starting lineup intact. That means extensions for george and Stephenson and a new contract for West. That also means, by default, that Granger has to go. Obviously losing him for the season is going to hurt any trade value he has. Maybe he could net a pick between 10-15? Pacers would still have to take salary back though.

Click on a tab to select how you'd like to leave your comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>